Legal Opinion

Ceisel v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1948No. 30482. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

John Drexler filed with the Industrial Commission an application for adjustment of claim against Stephen Ceisel alleging that he sustained an accidental injury on January 18, 1945, arising out of and in the course of his employment by Ceisel as a foreman of bricklayers. It is alleged in his application that he spent the entire day inspecting outside work and that his foot was frozen, developing into trench foot. The arbitrator awarded compensation in accordance with section 8 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Industrial Commission without additional evidence sustained the award, which…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. E. Baggot Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mazursky v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Union Starch v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Martin v. Kralis Poultry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Henry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API