Legal Opinion

Henry v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1952No. 32284, 32285, ConsPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

Otto Renner is a carpenter. On October 31, 1949, while engaged in the reconstruction of a grain elevator at Prairie du Rocher, he sustained an injury resulting in total permanent loss of vision in his right eye. He filed an amended application for adjustment of claim with the Industrial Commission, alleging that his injury arose out of his employment by Randolph Service Company and Roy Henry, a carpenter contractor, and naming as respondents Randolph Service Company, Henry, and their respective insurance carriers. The arbitrator and the commission found that Henry was the employer, directed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartley v. Red Ball Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bristol & Gale Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. American Stevedores Co v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Immaculate Conception Church v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ragler Motor Sales v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Henn v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. M & M Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wenholdt v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API