Legal Opinion

Union Starch v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1974No. 45783PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The claimant, Lloyd E. Curtis, received an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the circuit court of Madison County confirmed the award. This is an appeal from that judgment. The issue before this court is whether the injury arose out of and in the course of Curtis’s employment.

The material facts are not in dispute. Curtis had been employed by Union Starch, Division of Miles Laboratories, Inc., and its predecessor companies, for about 15 years. On the date in question, he was working the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. shift, in the refinery building. There was no set time for the evening…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Material Service Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Scholl v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Henn v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Williams v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Orsini v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Scheffler Greenhouses, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Eagle Discount Supermarket v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API