Legal Opinion

Ruckman v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1914No. 3902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Blaine County; Action by the State against Ralph Hawkins and others on a forfeited appearance bond. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Charles W. Ruckman brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This suit is to recover the amount of a forfeited appearance bond from Ralph Hawkins, the principal, and Chas. W. Ruckman and others, the sureties thereon.The defendant Ruckman filed an answer to plaintiff’s amended petition, and the court, on motion of the plaintiff, entered judgment in the amount of the bond on the pleadings. Of course this was equivalent to holding that the answer did not state a defense. The defendant Ruckman appealed from the judgment of the court, and appears here as the plaintiff in error, and urges that the petition is insufficient: First, for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. State v. BiesmanMontana Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Holmes v. State ex rel. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Gregory v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API