State v. Biesman
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from, Third Judicial District, Deer Lodge County. Action on criminal recognizance. The defendants’ demurrer was sustained and judgment rendered in their favor by Durfee, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.
The complaint alleges that a complaint was filed July 15, 1890, in the Justice’s Court of Deer Lodge County, which charged Biesman with the crime of unlawfully obstructing the public highway. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine and the costs, and remanded to the custody of the sheriff to stand committed until the same should be *12satisfied. Biesman then filed a notice of appeal, and, in order to secure liis release, entered into a recognizance undertaking, which contained these recitals and conditions: — ■
“Whereas, on the eighteenth day of July, A. D. 1890, one August Biesman was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Garrick v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson v. JarrattTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kinsley v. New Vulture Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1907
- Shriver v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.