Legal Opinion

State v. Hines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1913No. 2490PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from District Court, Sequoyah County: John II. Pitchford, Judge. ■ Action on a statutory bail bond by the State of Oklahoma against Frank Hines, John McEachin, and Paul Winsett. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant Hines, and for defendants McEachin and Winsett, and the State brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

On February 2, 1910, the defendant in error Frank Hines was in custody, charged with having violated the state prohibitory laws in three separate cases, num- berecl 432, 441, 462. On said day the county court of Sequoyah county made and caused to be entered an order fixing the bail-of said defendant at the sum of' $1,500 for his appearance on the first Monday in April, 1910, the bond fixed in said sum to include all three of said cases. On the same day a bond, signed by said W. F. Hines, as principal, and John McEaehin and Paul Winsett, as sureties> was tendered the county…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  2. Friedline v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Foulke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Knight v. State Ex Rel. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ramer v. State Ex Rel. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Abel v. State Ex Rel. SayeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Metcalf v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API