Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Eli Lilly & Co.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided March 29, 2002No. 2:99-cv-00256PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, District Judge.

This is a drug product liability case in which the Plaintiffs claim that Elvira Espinoza shot and killed-her children and then committed suicide as a result of her ingestion of Prozac, an antidepressant manufactured by Defendant Eh Lilly & Company (“Lilly”). Before the Court are Lilly’s motions for summary judgment on the grounds of lack of admissible expert testimony on causation and lack of probable cause. For the reasons stated below, Lilly’s motions (Docs. 96 & 101) are granted.

I. Background

For the purpose of resolving these summary judgment…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Neurontin Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  2. Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  3. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. Arizona State Hospital v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API