Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Drainage Products, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 2002No. 2001-0588PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 171.] GIBSON, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. DRAINAGE PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as Gibson v. Drainage Products, Inc.,
2002-Ohio-2008.] Employer and employee—Requirements employee must satisfy in order to prevail against employer for an intentional tort—Fyffe v. Jeno’s, Inc., applied— Determining whether sufficient evidence exists to survive employer’s motion for a directed verdict. (No. 2001-0588—Submitted February 6, 2002—Decided May 8, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Paulding County, No. 11-99-14,
2001-Ohio-211…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stone v. North Star Steel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Woodside Mgt. Co. v. BruexOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Fleming v. Aas Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Zara Constr., Inc. v. BelcastroOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.