North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Myers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The pleadings of defendants Sarah V. Myers and Irvin J. Myers relate primarily to their controversy inter se with reference to the $10,455.00 now on deposit with the clerk. Neither has filed answer to the allegations of the complaint. It would seem appropriate that they do so if they desire a judicial determination as to what constitutes adequate and just compensation for the property appropriated by the Commission. G.S. 136-105, 106, 107.
The sole question for decision is whether Sarah Y. Myers is presently entitled to have distributed to her any portion of the $10,455.00 deposit. Decision…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Whitlock v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
- McKinnon, Currie & Co. v. CaulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Freeman v. BelferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. One 1984 Toyota TruckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Forsyth County v. PlemmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Koob v. KoobSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Rodieck v. RodieckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.