Legal Opinion

State v. One 1984 Toyota Truck

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 23, 1987No. 13, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*175ADKINS, Judge.

Md.Code (1982 Repl.Vol., 1987 Cum.Supp.), Art. 27, § 297, deals with forfeiture of property, including illegal controlled dangerous substances (CDS), and property used or intended to be used in connection with the manufacture, delivery, packaging, or transportation of those substances. Motor vehicles (conveyances) are among the kinds of property encompassed by the statute. But as to them § 297(a)(4)(iii) provides:

No conveyance shall be forfeited under the provisions of this section to the extent of the interest of any owner of the conveyance who neither knew nor should have…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Stevens v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Aravanis v. Somerset CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. State of Ga. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. 1986 Mercedes Benz 560 Ce Vin: WDBCA45DGA211147 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API