Legal Opinion

Gitlitz v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 2001No. 99-1295PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed tax deficiencies against petitioners David and Louise Gitlitz and Philip and Eleanor Winn because they used nontaxed discharge of indebtedness to increase their bases in S corporation stock and to deduct suspended losses. In this case we must answer two questions. First, we must decide whether the Internal Revenue Code (Code) permits taxpayers to increase bases in their S corporation stock by the amount of an S corporation’s discharge of indebtedness excluded from gross income. And, second, if the Code permits such an in*209crease, we must decide…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bufferd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Dallas T. & T. Warehouse Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. Nelson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  4. United States v. Harold D. Farley Gail D. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Astoria Marine Construction Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Martin Alpert and Carolyn Alpert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. United States v. LachmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API