Astoria Marine Construction Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Johnson, Judge:
Petitioner settled notes on which it was obligated to Watzek in the amount of $26,000 for a cash payment of $500. They were not purchase money notes, and petitioner bore no relation tothe seller other than that of debtor. Petitioner seeks to characterize the $20,000 loan, which was needed and used in constructing the vessel for the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, as part of a transaction or venture on which it lost money. But such a view was considered and rejected by this Court in petitioner’s prior proceeding, Docket No. 1868, involving tax deficiencies for 1939. We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commissioner v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Helvering v. American Chicle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gitlitz v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Danenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Gershkowitz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Sheraton Plaza Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Astoria Marine Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.