Legal Opinion
United States v. Lachman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 25, 2004No. 03-2274, 03-2275PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
The issue on the government’s appeal is whether the term “specially designed” as used in 15 C.F.R. § 399.1, Supp. 1 (1988) (now 15 C.F.R. § 774, Supp. 1 (2004)), is unconstitutionally vague.
Defendants Walter L. Lachman, Maurice H. Subilia, Jr., Fiber Materials, Inc. (“FMI”), and Materials International, Inc., were convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on charges of violating and conspiring to violate the Export Administration Act of 1979, Pub.L. 96-72, 93 Stat. 503 (codified at 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401-2420 (2000)) (“EAA”), and its…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Ridley v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Pharm. Industry Average Wholesale Price Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Zhen Zhou WuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Martinez-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.