Legal Opinion

Shoshone First Bank v. Pacific Employers Insurance Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2000No. 98-146PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only question presented in this case relates to the allocation to, and recovery from, an insured by an insurance carrier of part of the costs and expenses of litigation. Pacific Employers Insurance Company (Pacific) seeks to allocate and recover for both the costs attributable to non-covered claims under the policy and the costs attributable to a counterclaim. Shoshone First Bank and United Bancorporation of Wyoming, Inc. (collectively Shoshone) vigorously assert that the allocation and recovery of the costs of litigation should not be permitted. This case comes to us as a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Yount v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Texas Ass'n of Counties County Government Risk Management Pool v. Matagorda CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2001

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API