General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
At issue in this case is whether, following a declaration that an insurer has no duty to defend its insured, the insurer is entitled to reimbursement of the amounts paid for the defense of its insured in the underlying lawsuit. The circuit and appellate courts held that the insurer was entitled to reimbursement. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgments of the circuit and appellate courts.
BACKGROUND
The City of Chicago and Cook County sued Midwest Sporting Goods Company (Midwest) and other defendants for creating a public nuisance by selling guns to inappropriate purchasers. Midwest…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Swiderski Electronics, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Federated Mutual Insurance Com v. Coyle Mechanical Supply Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Virginia Surety Co. v. Northern InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.