Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2010No. 08-8064, 08-8068PublishedCited by 402 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of an insurance dispute involving the construction of a luxury hotel in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (“EMC”) brought a diversity action in federal district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 2201, requesting a declaratory judgment as to its duty to defend or indemnify Bartile Roofs, Inc. (“Bar-tile”), against claims pending in California state court. EMC also sought to recoup the costs it had incurred in defending Bar-tile in the underlying state-court action. After denying Bartile’s motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by402 opinions

  1. Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Marcus Food Co. v. DiPanfiloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Compania De Inversiones v. Grupo Cementos de ChihuahuaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Monge v. RG Petro-Machinery (Group) Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

397 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API