Legal Opinion
Ahlers Building Supply, Inc. v. Larsen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1995No. 18686PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
Homeowners appeal damages awarded to a contractor on a home remodeling project. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Vickie and Peter Larsen (Larsens) solicited bids for remodeling their home. After presenting preliminary architectural plans to Ahlers Building Supply (Ahlers), its agent, Todd Lindgren, developed a blueprint and offered a base contract bid of $45,500. Any additional changes the Larsens might later request beyond the original plans would cost more. The Larsens accepted. Construction was scheduled to begin the week of April 22, 1991 and end the week of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Brown-Marx Associates, Ltd. And Gary E. Smith v. Emigrant Savings Bank and Prudential Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Campion v. Parkview ApartmentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Dakota Foundry, Inc. v. Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Mathis Implement Co. v. HeathSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith Masonry v. Wipi Group, USA, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Dakota Style Foods, Inc. v. Sunopta Grains & Foods, Inc.United States District Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.