Legal Opinion

Brown-Marx Associates, Ltd. And Gary E. Smith v. Emigrant Savings Bank and Prudential Savings Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 2, 1983No. 82-7023PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

This diversity case concerns a dispute between a prospective borrower and a bank over a $1.1 million loan commitment for financing an office building. Emigrant Savings Bank refused to lend the money, maintaining among other things that Brown-Marx Associates, the would-be borrower, had failed to satisfy the minimum rental requirement of the commitment. Brown-Marx sued the bank alleging breach of contract and various tort theories of recovery. The matter was tried to a jury which found for Brown-Marx on its contract claim. The district court granted the bank’s motion for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Daniels v. Twin Oaks Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Retail Developers of Alabama, LLC v. East Gadsden Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API