Mathis Implement Co. v. Heath
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] James and Rebekah Heath (Heath) contracted with Mathis Implement Company (Mathis) to install concrete for a shed floor and for footings and walls for a basement for Heath’s pre-built home. Mathis sought $28,033.02 for the completed work. After nonpayment by Heath, Mathis brought an action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien. As a defense, Heath claimed breach of contract. Heath also counterclaimed for breach of contract and breach of warranty. The trial court ruled in favor of Mathis on all issues. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] In May 2001, Heath purchased property on which to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A.P. & Sons Construction v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Ahlers Building Supply, Inc. v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Aldrich v. WilmarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Van Den Hoek v. BradwischSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Dixon v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Smith Masonry v. Wipi Group, USA, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. FoshaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Bank of America, N.A. v. DriggsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003