Legal Opinion

Mathis Implement Co. v. Heath

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James and Rebekah Heath (Heath) contracted with Mathis Implement Company (Mathis) to install concrete for a shed floor and for footings and walls for a basement for Heath’s pre-built home. Mathis sought $28,033.02 for the completed work. After nonpayment by Heath, Mathis brought an action to foreclose its mechanic’s lien. As a defense, Heath claimed breach of contract. Heath also counterclaimed for breach of contract and breach of warranty. The trial court ruled in favor of Mathis on all issues. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] In May 2001, Heath purchased property on which to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A.P. & Sons Construction v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ahlers Building Supply, Inc. v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Aldrich v. WilmarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Van Den Hoek v. BradwischSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dixon v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Smith Masonry v. Wipi Group, USA, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. FoshaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. DriggsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API