Legal Opinion

Stapper v. GMI Holdings, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1999No. A085012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

Melanie Stapper brings this appeal from the trial court’s grant of nonsuit on her claims against GMI Holdings, Inc., doing business as the Genie Company (Genie). The trial court concluded that “the Firefighter’s Rule bars plaintiff’s claims as a matter of law.” We reverse.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

At the trial court’s request and prior to selection of a jury, Stapper made an offer of proof as to the evidence that she would present to “overcome the firefighter’s rule.” Stapper offered to prove facts in pertinent part as follows: On March 8, 1995, Melanie Stapper…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. North County Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  4. Kapherr v. MFG Chemical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Terry v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API