Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER AFTER RECONSIDERATION: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FORUM NON CONVE-NIENS AND INTERNATIONAL COMITY, AND (3) GRANTING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
(ECF Nos. 69 & 73)
Honorable Jams L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc.’s (“TEPCO”) Motion for Reconsideration or, Alternatively, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). (Mot. Reconsideration, ECF No. 73.) TEPCO asks the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Lindsay Cooper v. Tokyo Elec. Power Co. HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Imamura v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Bartel v. Tokyo Elec. Power Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Alcide v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.