Legal Opinion

Coven v. Coven

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 14, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

64 N.J. Super. 6 (1960)

165 A.2d 200

NATHANIEL B. COVEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GEISHA COVEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 7, 1960.

Decided November 14, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, HANEMAN and FOLEY.

Mr. Max Schomer argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Nathaniel B. Coven, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

2Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment nisi awarding plaintiff a divorce on the ground of adultery, and from the dismissal of her counterclaim for separate maintenance. It is contended that (1) the trial court erroneously concluded that an act…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orens v. OrensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  3. Eberhard v. EberhardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Lasker v. LaskerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  5. Berckmans v. BerckmansNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Husband v. WifeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API