Orens v. Orens
New Jersey Court of Chancery
This matter was referred to Samuel D. Oliphant, advisory master, who filed the following conclusions: On final hearing on petition for divorce and proofs ex parte. The petition alleges desertion in the month of June, 1905. Suit was commenced December 9th, 1916. In the proofs returned with the special master’s report in favor of a decree of divorce, there was no corroboration of petitioner’s testimony to the first four years of the alleged desertion.
Read the full summary
This matter was referred to Samuel D. Oliphant, advisory master, who filed the following conclusions: On final hearing on petition for divorce and proofs ex parte. The petition alleges desertion in the month of June, 1905. Suit was commenced December 9th, 1916. In the proofs returned with the special master’s report in favor of a decree of divorce, there was no corroboration of petitioner’s testimony to the first four years of the alleged desertion. Upon receiving my memorandum to that effect solicitor obtained an order of re-reference for further proofs of the continuation of the desertion.…
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
An order will be made in conformity with the advice contained in the conclusions of Advisory Master Oliphant, which are hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Knudsen v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Graml v. GramlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Appel v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.