Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 20, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

“The husband petitions for divorce alleging adultery. The wife denies, and recriminates; she also counter-claims on a separate agreement whereby the husband agreed to pay her $250 a month, alleging default in payment since August, 1927, and asking decree for installments past due and for future performance. “On the charge of recrimination the proofs wholly fail. “On the husband’s charge of adultery the proofs are such as to convince the court that the charges are true.

Read the full summary

“The husband petitions for divorce alleging adultery. The wife denies, and recriminates; she also counter-claims on a separate agreement whereby the husband agreed to pay her $250 a month, alleging default in payment since August, 1927, and asking decree for installments past due and for future performance. “On the charge of recrimination the proofs wholly fail. “On the husband’s charge of adultery the proofs are such as to convince the court that the charges are true. No witnesses testify to observance of the act itself, but it appears by witnesses on both sides that co-respondent lived with…

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tbenchaed, Pabkee, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Sabbarese v. SabbareseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API