Lasker v. Lasker
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On petition, &c. On final hearing on master’s report ex parte.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
A careful reading of the testimony annexed to the master’s report discloses the fact that there is absolutely no corroboration of the continued desertion of the petitioner by the defeñdant. The marriage is corroborated, and also the fact of willful and obstinate desertion on January 8th, 1915. The petitioner continued to live with her child at her parent’s house at Port Richmond, Staten Island, from'that time until March 1st, 1916, when she went to reside with her married sister in Bayonne, New Jersey. Her sister was called as a witness but does not sajr a word .to the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Dorrian v. DavisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Coven v. CovenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Stewart v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Wines v. WinesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.