Legal Opinion

Cornelison v. . Hammond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1944PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHill, J.

The deed of plaintiffs calls for the Hammond corner as the beginning corner and the Hammond deed refers to the same point as the W. B. Lassiter corner. Location of this beginning point is the primary issue. When that is established, the location of the line will become routine.

The court held that there was no sufficient evidence that the pine at Black A, relied on by plaintiffs as the corner, is in fact a marked corner and so instructed the jury. It then gave these further instructions:

“The Court instructs you that Black E is the terminus of the first call in the deed from W. B. Lassiter to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  2. Euliss v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Lee v. . BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Greer v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Doe on the Demise of Dobson v. FinleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1862

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Town of Belhaven v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API