Legal Opinion

Town of Belhaven v. Hodges

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1946PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellants present only two questions for our consideration and determination: (1) Is the testimony of H. L. Rayburn, as to the statement made to him by H. R. Keaton, now deceased, as to the location of the dividing line between the lands of the Town of Belhaven and H. R. Keaton competent? (2) Can a surveyor disregard the beginning point in a deed and start his survey at the second call of the deed, when suek point is neither known nor established, and is his testimony based upon such survey competent evidence?

Ordinarily a corner or line called for in a junior deed will not be controlling…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  3. Teseneer v. Henrietta Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Doe on the Demise of Dobson v. FinleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1862
  5. Edwards v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics Beneficiary DegreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson County Board of Education v. LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API