Legal Opinion

California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. L. A. No. 18419PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— Jane Duffus was employed as a stenographer in Fullerton by the Val Vita Food Products, Inc. She and several other employees of the company lived in Los Angeles thirty-three miles away, and for their convenience the company purchased an automobile to transport them to and from work. There was a bus line between Los Angeles and Fullerton, and the employees were not required to use the automobile, but those who did were charged $4.00 a month, representing a pro rata share of the running expenses, which was deducted from their wages. The employees would decide among themselves who was to drive,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  3. Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Konopka v. Jackson County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Breland v. Traylor Engineering & Manufacturing, Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API