Legal Opinion
American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Curry
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1938No. 12249PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
The ruling announced in the first headnote does not require elaboration.
The Court of Appeals, after stating certain facts, ruled that “the inference is authorized that the custom of hauling the employees to and from the mill on the truck of the employer became a part of the contract of employment by implication,” and consequently “where one of the employees, when returning from the mill on the truck, was injured by falling from the truck, his injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. Cooper v. Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co., 179 Ga. 256 (175 S. E.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Ray Bell Construction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Stenger v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Anthony J. Rossano, Jr., B/n/f Anthony J. Rossano, Sr. v. Blue Plate Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.