Legal Opinion
State of Mo. v. Andrews
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided May 3, 1984No. CV82-L-442, CV82-L-443PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
URBOM, Chief Judge.
This memorandum concerns the issue of the authority of the Secretary of the Interi- or to sign a contract with Energy Transportation Systems, Inc. (ETSI) which would allow ETSI to use water from Oahe Reservoir in a coal slurry pipeline. The complaints in both of these cases allege that the Secretary lacked authority to enter into the contract. The defendants have moved to dismiss these claims, and cross-motions for partial summary judgment also have been filed. Filings 57, 73, 93 and 143 in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hi-Craft Clothing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- ETSI Pipeline Project v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- South Dakota v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Missouri v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- State of South Dakota, South Dakota Conservancy District, an Agency of the State of South Dakota v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Kansas City Southern Railway Company, a Foreign Corporation, State of South Dakota, South Dakota Conservancy District, an Agency of the State of South Dakota v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Kansas City Southern Railway Company, a Foreign Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.