Legal Opinion

Estate of H. Gibson Son

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Randolph Gibson was appointed administrator of the partnership estate of H. Gibson and Son. The estate was insolvent, having funds to pay only about 50 per cent of the claims of the creditors. Objection was made to the confirmation and approval of the final report of the administrator, by reason of the payment of 50 per cent dividends on seventeen claims not verified by affidavit as required by statute. The County Court overruled the objec-. tions to the final report and an appeal was had to the Circuit Court, where the same ruling was made. The objecting creditors now appeal to this court.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Security & Loan Co. v. EnglehartWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Empson v. FortuneWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dillabough v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Willis v. MarksOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Easton v. Boston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Mannix EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kirchner v. ClostermanOregon Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API