Easton v. Boston Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This was an action to foreclose a deed of trust given by the respondent, Boston Investment Company, as counter-security to protect the Pacific Coast Casualty Company on a bond issued by it. Plaintiff is the assignee of the obligee in the bond. Judgment went in favor of the defendant, Boston Investment Company; denied to plaintiff the relief sought, and decreed that he had no right, title, or interest, lien, or claim in the subject of his attempted foreclosure. He appeals from this judgment.
The case was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, which showed that on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- National Surety Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- California Sav. Bank v. American Surety Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
- McBeth & Compton v. McIntyreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- McPhetridge v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mahana v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. LarkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.