In Re Mannix Estate

The issues awaiting our disposition will be better understood after a statement has been made of the facts out of which this controversy arose. The following, we believe, fairly states the facts: March 1,1922, N. E. Harju obtained a judgment for $6,000 against E. W. Anderson in the circuit court for Clatsop county, which was affirmed on appeal by this court in 1924 in Harju v. Anderson, 111 Or. 414 (225 P. 1100). See, also, Anderson v. Harju, 113 Or. 552 (233 P. 848). Joseph Mannix, a member of the bar and co-partner of E. E. Mathison in the practice of law, during the course of the trial in…