Legal Opinion
City of Litchfield v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1960No. 37,934Published
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This proceeding was instituted by the city of Litchfield in Meeker County to determine the settlement of Florence Kinlund, a poor person, within the provisions of M. S. A. c. 261. The township of Paynesville in Steams County, city of Willmar, Kandiyohi County, village of Atwater, and village of Kimball are defendants. Findings were entered determining the township of Paynesville to be the settlement for poor-relief purposes of Florence Kinlund and dismissing the proceedings as to Atwater, Kimball, and Willmar. The township of Paynesville moved for a new trial which was denied…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ostrowski v. MockridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Ammon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Dix v. Harris Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.