Legal Opinion

People v. Nickerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 2005No. C045602PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROME, J.

Trial court unification and the resulting elimination of the municipal court was authorized by constitutional amendment in 1998. As with all major overhauls of the law, this one created at least one problem. Here, we unravel that issue.

The original complaint in this case included a felony and two misdemeanors. After the preliminary examination, the trial court, acting as magistrate, held defendant to answer only on the two misdemeanors. After the jury convicted defendant of one of the misdemeanors, defendant filed a notice of appeal in the superior court. Because the clerk of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Marston v. KuhlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. LynallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Naidu v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Griffith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API