Legal Opinion

Naidu v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 7, 2018No. E068437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P.J.

*305Petitioners, Jimmy and Uma Naidu, challenge a trial court order preventing them from using their licenses from the Contractors' State Licensing Board (CSLB) as a condition of bail. Because we agree that this condition could not have been imposed without some sort of evidentiary hearing at which it was established that the bail condition was necessary to protect the public, we grant the petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Petitioners allegedly sold at least one of their business licenses to one Raj Suri, whose own CSLB license was suspended, and then failed to supervise Suri despite…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In re HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. M.H.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. People v. Zhou CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API