Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 2011No. B228470PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Paul Stephen Griffith (petitioner) is charged in an information with a felony and two misdemeanors. He moved to set aside one of the misdemeanors on the ground that no evidence supporting the charge was offered at the preliminary hearing. (Pen. Code,1 § 995, subd. (a)(2)(B).) The *947trial court concluded that cases establishing the need to present such evidence (e.g., Medellin v. Superior Court (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 290 [212 Cal.Rptr. 171] (Medellin); People v. Thiecke (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 1015 [213 Cal.Rptr. 731] (Thiecke)), are no longer controlling in light of subsequent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Whitman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Burris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- P. v. Gastineau CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Jaramillo CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020