Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lynall

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 2015No. H041737PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARQUEZ, J.

— In this case, as in the companion case of People v. Rivera (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 1085 [183 Cal.Rptr.3d 362] (Rivera), we review the effect, if any, of recently enacted Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, on appellate jurisdiction.

In Rivera, after the court imposed a felony sentence, the defendant petitioned to have his sentence recalled and to be resentenced as a misdemeanant pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18, which the voters enacted as part of Proposition 47. (Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Rivera also asked…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. FeyrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. Manzy W.California Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. Rivas-ColonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. AbdallahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. Mullins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. J.C.California Court of Appeal · 2016

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API