Legal Opinion

Hester v. Barnett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1987No. WD 36517PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The action for damages by the plaintiffs Hester, husband and wife, against defendant Barnett, a Baptist clergyman, commenced as a petition in defamation. The motion of the defendant to dismiss that petition was sustained, and the plaintiffs were granted leave to present a more definite and certain statement of the defamation. The petition as amended pleads not only defamation, but also five other separate causes of action denominated: [Count I] Ministerial Malpractice, [Count II] Alienation of Affections, [Count III] Defamation of Character, [Count IV] Intentional Infliction…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stevens v. RedwingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API