Hester v. Barnett
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Judge.
The action for damages by the plaintiffs Hester, husband and wife, against defendant Barnett, a Baptist clergyman, commenced as a petition in defamation. The motion of the defendant to dismiss that petition was sustained, and the plaintiffs were granted leave to present a more definite and certain statement of the defamation. The petition as amended pleads not only defamation, but also five other separate causes of action denominated: [Count I] Ministerial Malpractice, [Count II] Alienation of Affections, [Count III] Defamation of Character, [Count IV] Intentional Infliction…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Stevens v. RedwingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.