Legal Opinion

Turner v. Ward

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1876No. 129PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. The ease is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This case presents for our consideration little else than a question of fact. The plaintiffs charge in substance that they were induced by false representations to sell the defendants certain goods, and asked to have the contract of sale rescinded, and their goods restored. The testimony is all embraced in the depositions of one of the plaintiffs and one of the defendants and an agreed statement. There is some discrepancy between the statements of *619the two witnesses, but it is apparent from the testimony of the defendant, who made the representations complained of, that he himself had been…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Gerald JOHNSON, Bankrupt, CARLISLE CASHWAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald JOHNSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Putnam v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Manly v. Ohio Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  4. Canadian Agency, Ltd. v. Assets Realization Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Joslyn v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API