Legal Opinion

Joslyn v. Cadillac Automobile Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1910No. 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. Action by George A. Joslyn against tlie Cadillac Automobile Company. Judgment lor defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error brought suit against the defendant for tlie recovery of the purchase price of an automobile claimed to have been bought by plaintiff from defendant; plaintiff having elected to rescind the purchase by reason of certain alleged false and material representations claimed to have induced the sale. There was a jury trial. The judge submitted to the jury the questions of fact involved, but later instructed a verdict for defendant. The apparent ground of this direction is that in the opinion of the court there was no substantial evidence that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Shama v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Davis v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Marmet Coal Co. v. People's Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. Mosby v. Manhattan Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API