Canadian Agency, Ltd. v. Assets Realization Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Frank Gr. Webster and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff,- entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of July, 1914, overruling a demurrer to the second amended complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
The facts admitted by the demurrer herein may be summarized as follows: The individual defendants compose the respective firms of Kidder, Peabody & Co., and F. S. Moseley & Co. Prior to October, 1912, said firms, together with the defendant corporation, Assets Eealization Company, were joint owners of certain 'shares of stock in the United States Worsted Company (a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts hereinafter referred to as the company), including first preferred stock, second preferred stock and common stock, in excess, in each of said…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- President, Directors, & Co. of Newburgh & Cochecton Turnpike Road v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
- Dunn v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Leary v. . GellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hill v. International Products Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
- Dennin v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Buffalo Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Batavia Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.