Legal Opinion
Manly v. Ohio Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1928No. 2645PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order directing that the trustee in bankruptcy of the Baltimore Shoe House, Inc., return to the petitioner, the Ohio Shoe Company, certain shoes in his possession as trustee. Return of the shoes was asked on the ground that bankrupt had obtained -them by fraud and false representations as to its financial condition, that petitioner elected to rescind the sale on that account, and that the goods could be readily identified, being intact in the warehouse of the bankrupt.
The facts upon which the claim of petitioner is based may be briefly stated.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Gillespie v. J. C. Piles & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
- Brown v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- In Re MeiselmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- La Capitol Federal Credit Union v. Melancon (In Re Melancon)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.