Legal Opinion

Miller v. Foremost Motors, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1993No. G014114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

We transferred this case from the appellate department of the superior court on our own motion (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 62(a)) to determine whether an employer can unilaterally dismiss an action after it had appealed a Labor Commission award by seeking a trial de novo in municipal court. Consistent with the practice concerning trial de novo following arbitration, we hold an employer does not have a unilateral right to dismiss once it has filed a request for trial de novo. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the municipal court.

Facts

We adopt, in substance, the statement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pressler v. Donald L. Bren Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Marracino v. BrandstetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Wechsler v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mamika v. BarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API