Marracino v. Brandstetter
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
On appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a trial de novo, defendant Zachary Brandstetter contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to enter judgment on a judicial arbitration award. We disagree. Accordingly, we shall affirm.
Background
Plaintiffs William G. and Vivian D. Marracino sued defendant for breach of contract, fraud and other causes of action arising from a $34,000 loan they had made him. The matter was ordered to judicial arbitration. On November 6, 1989, the arbitrator issued an award for plaintiffs in the amount of $53,112.96 plus costs.
On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Hebert v. HarnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Healy v. OnstottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calderon v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Miller v. Foremost Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Carlisle v. PetroskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006