Legal Opinion
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 12, 2000No. 99-295PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Per curiam
I
Congress has adopted a policy that favors contracting with small businesses owned and controlled by the socially and economically disadvantaged. See § 8(d)(1) of the Small Business Act, as added by §7 of Pub. L. 87-305,75 Stat. 667, and as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 637(d)(1) (1994 ed., Supp. IV). To effectuate that policy, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), Pub. L. 102-240, § 1003(b), 105 Stat. 1919, which is an appropriations measure for the Department of Transportation (DOT), seeks to direct 10 percent of the contracting funds expended on projects funded in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.