United States v. Pena
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, Judge:
Appellant contests the military judge’s denial of his motion for a mistrial which appellant founded on the manner in which he thinks the members voted on findings.
Paragraph 74d, Manual for Courts-Martial, 1969 (Rev.) (MCM), states that the members should vote on specifications first, then on the charge under which brought; it indicates that voting by secret written ballot should be individual as to each specification. See Military Judges’ Guide, DA Pam 27-9, paragraph 2-4.
Appellant was convicted of six specifications under one charge alleging violations of Article 92, Uniform…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. SuterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. BolandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. HigdonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. McAllisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. WilburnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. JonesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. LentzNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. MartinezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. Specialist KRISTOPHER M. HADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017