Legal Opinion

United States v. Pena

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1981No. NCM 80 1567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, Judge:

Appellant contests the military judge’s denial of his motion for a mistrial which appellant founded on the manner in which he thinks the members voted on findings.

Paragraph 74d, Manual for Courts-Martial, 1969 (Rev.) (MCM), states that the members should vote on specifications first, then on the charge under which brought; it indicates that voting by secret written ballot should be individual as to each specification. See Military Judges’ Guide, DA Pam 27-9, paragraph 2-4.

Appellant was convicted of six specifications under one charge alleging violations of Article 92, Uniform…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SuterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. BolandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. HigdonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975
  4. United States v. McAllisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. WilburnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  2. United States v. LentzNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  3. United States v. MartinezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. Specialist KRISTOPHER M. HADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API