Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilburn

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 11, 1970No. 23,135PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

In United States v Williams, 20 USCMA 47, 42 CMR 239 (1970), we held that failure of the military judge to inquire of the appellant personally if he had anything to say in his own behalf before sentencing did not make the later sentence illegal. That same issue in this case is controlled by our opinion in United States v Williams, supra. The decision of the Court of Military Review is therefore affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HawkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. WalkerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. KoekU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. PenaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. MartinezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API