Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Higdon

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 5, 1975No. CM 428681PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CLAUSE, Judge:

Appellant was tried by general court-martial for two offenses of larceny and three offenses of receiving graft, in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 934. He was convicted of the two larceny offenses and of one of the three graft offenses. The sentence was to be dishonorably discharged, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to pay a fine of $25,000.00. The sentence was approved as adjudged.

Appellant’s initial assignment of error concerns the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to establish his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. PariniU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. HanceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  3. United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. WhitekillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. MyersU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API