Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Lovegren

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1902No. 4155PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William K. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This appeal is from an order granting respondent’s motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover treble damages for trespass, under §§ 5656 and 5657, Bal. Coda The complaint alleged the ownership of certain land in respondent; that the appellants knowingly and wilfully entered upon the land and knowingly, wrongfully, and wilfully cut down and converted into shingle bolts and removed therefrom certain cedar trees, the total value of which was $700; that, by reason of such wilful and unlawful entry, respondent was damaged in the sum…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cohn v. NeevesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Loewenberg v. RosenthalOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wallace v. FinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Whitecraft v. VanderverIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Broughton Lumber Co. v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bailey v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lawrence v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API